ISSN: 1309 - 3843 E-ISSN: 1307 - 7384
FİZİKSEL TIP VE REHABİLİTASYON
BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ
www.jpmrs.com
Kayıtlı İndexler
ORIJINAL ARAŞTIRMA
Northwick Park Boyun Ağrısı Anketi Türkçe Formunun Kültürler Arası Çevirisi, Geçerliliği ve Güvenilirliği
Cross-Cultural Translation, Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire
Received Date : 04 Nov 2022
Accepted Date : 14 May 2023
Available Online : 23 May 2023
Özet PDF Benzer Makaleler
Ebru YILMAZa, Teoman AYDINa, Özge PASİNb
aDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Romatology, Bezmiâlem Vakıf University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye bDepartment of Biostatistics, Bezmiâlem Vakıf University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye
Doi: 10.31609/jpmrs.2022-94174 - Makale Dili: EN
J PMR Sci. 2023;26(3):282-9
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Northwick Park Boyun Ağrısı Anketi’ni [Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ)] Türkçeye çevirmek ve Türk popülasyonunda boyun ağrısı olan hastalar arasında güvenilirliğini ve geçerliliğini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmaya en az 3 aydır kronik boyun ağrısı olan 100 kişi (67 kadın, 33 erkek) dâhil edildi. Tüm katılımcılardan NPQ, Boyun Özürlülük İndeksi [Neck Disability Index (NDI)] ve Boyun Ağrısı ve Özürlülük Ölçeği’ni [Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS)] başvuru gününde ve bir hafta sonra doldurmaları istendi. Güvenirliğin değerlendirilmesi için test-tekrar test ve iç tutarlılık analizleri uygulanmıştır. Test-tekrar test analizi, sınıf içi korelasyon katsayısı [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)] yöntemi (%95 güven aralığı) kullanılarak değerlendirildi. İç tutarlılık için Cronbach alfa katsayısı değeri hesaplanmıştır. Yakınsak geçerlilik için Spearman korelasyon katsayısı analizi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Çalışmada ortalama yaş 46,68±12,11 yıl idi. NPQ iyi bir iç tutarlılığa (Cronbach alfa=0,704) ve mükemmel test-tekrar test güvenilirliğine (ICC=0,995) sahipti. NPQ ile NDI arasındaki Spearman korelasyon katsayısı 0,648 ve NPQ ile NPDS arasındaki Spearman korelasyon katsayısı 0,811 olarak hesaplandı. Bu sonuçlar, NPQ’nun NDI ve NPDS ile çok iyi korele olduğunu gösterdi (p<0,001). Sonuç: Sonuçlarımız, NPQ’nun Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilir ve geçerli bir araç olduğunu göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Boyun ağrısı; Northwick Park Boyun Ağrısı Anketi; Türkçe versiyon; geçerlilik; güvenilirlik
ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim of this study was to translate the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) into the Turkish language and assess its reliability and validity among patients with neck pain in the Turkish population. Material and Methods: One hundred subjects (67 female, 33 male) who had chronic neck pain for at least 3 months were included in this study. All participants were asked to complete the NPQ, the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) on the day of admission, and one week later. The test-retest and internal consistency analyses were applied for the assessment of reliability. The test-retest analysis were assessed by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) method (95% confidence interval). The value of Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated for internal consistency. Spearman’s correlation coefficient analysis was used for convergent validity. Results: The mean age was 46.68±12.11 years in the study. The NPQ had a good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=0.704) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.995). Spearman’s correlation coefficient of the NPQ with the NDI was calculated at 0.648 and Spearman’s correlation coefficient of the NPQ with the NPDS was calculated at 0.811. These results showed that the NPQ is very good correlated with the NDI and the NPDS (p<0.001). Conclusion: Our results suggest that the Turkish version of the NPQ is a reliable and valid instrument.
Keywords: Neck pain; Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire; Turkish version; validity; reliability
REFERENCES
  1. Bicer A, Yazici A, Camdeviren H, et al. Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:959-62. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  2. Pietrobon R, Coeytaux RR, Carey TS, et al. Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27:515-22. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  3. Yao M, Sun YL, Cao ZY, et al. A systematic review of cross-cultural adaptation of the neck disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:480-90. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  4. Stefanovitch-Lawbuary N, Amirfeyz R, Lovell R, et al. Reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported outcome measures of neck disability to physical therapy: comparison of the copenhagen, northwick park, and neck bournemouth questionnaires and the neck disability index. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019;42:104-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  5. Kose G, Hepguler S, Atamaz F, et al. A comparison of four disability scales for Turkish patients with neck pain. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:358-62. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  6. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3186-91. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  7. Yeung PL, Chiu TT, Leung AS. Use of modified Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire in patients with postirradiation neck disability: validation study. Head Neck. 2004;26:1031-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  8. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:539-49. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  9. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed. Needham Heights: Allyn&Bacon Inc; 2006.
  10. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al; ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8:94-104. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  11. Aslan E, Karaduman A, Yakut Y, et al. The cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: a Turkish version study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:E362-5. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  12. González T, Balsa A, Sáinz de Murieta J, et al. Spanish version of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire: reliability and validity. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2001;19:41-6. [PubMed] 
  13. Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:231-40. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  14. Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:S15-20. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  15. Feise RJ, Michael Menke J. Functional rating index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:78-86 discussion 87. Erratum in: Spine 2001;26:596. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  16. Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14:409-15. Erratum in: J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992;15:followi. [PubMed] 
  17. Leak AM, Cooper J, Dyer S, et al. The Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire, devised to measure neck pain and disability. Br J Rheumatol. 1994;33:469-74. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  18. Wheeler AH, Goolkasian P, Baird AC, et al. Development of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Item analysis, face, and criterion-related validity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:1290-4. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  19. Wlodyka-Demaille S, Poiraudeau S, Catanzariti JF, et al. French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:376-82. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  20. Hoving JL, O'Leary EF, Niere KR, et al. Validity of the neck disability index, Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire, and problem elicitation technique for measuring disability associated with whiplash-associated disorders. Pain. 2003;102:273-81. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  21. Aguirre MV, Rodríguez MG, Clarett M, et al. Adaptación cultural y validación argentina del cuestionario Northwick park de dolor cervical en el ámbito hospitalario de la ciudad autónoma de Buenos Aires [Cultural adaptation and Argentine validation of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire in the hospitals of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires]. Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2013;70:76-82. [PubMed] 
  22. Almeida MQG, Dibai-Filho AV, Guirro RRJ, et al. Psychometric properties of the Brazilian short-version of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire. Clin Rehabil. 2022;36:980-92. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  23. Yılmaz O, Gafuroğlu Ü, Yüksel S. Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;65:59-66. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  24. Riddle DL, Stratford PW. Use of generic versus region-specific functional status measures on patients with cervical spine disorders. Phys Ther. 1998;78:951-63. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  25. Hains F, Waalen J, Mior S. Psychometric properties of the neck disability index. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998;21:75-80. [PubMed] 
Copyright © 2024
Bu sitenin tüm hakları Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Uzman Hekimleri Derneği'ne aittir.
Site Tasarım ve Yönetim: Türkiye Klinikleri