ISSN: 1309 - 3843 E-ISSN: 1307 - 7384
FİZİKSEL TIP VE REHABİLİTASYON
BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ
www.jpmrs.com
Kayıtlı İndexler


ORIJINAL ARAŞTIRMA

Kronik Koksidinili Hastalarda Radyofrekans Termokoagülasyon Tedavisinin Etkinliği
Efficacy of Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation Treatment in Patients with Chronic Coccydynia
Received Date : 14 Jun 2022
Accepted Date : 11 Jan 2023
Available Online : 16 Jan 2023
Doi: 10.31609/jpmrs.2022-91917 - Makale Dili: EN
J PMR Sci. 2023;26(2):147-53
ÖZET
Amaç: İmpar ganglion bloğu, pelvik yapılardan kaynaklanan birçok kronik ağrı sendromunda kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, konservatif tedaviye yanıt vermeyen kronik koksidini tanısı almış hastalarda radyofrekans termokoagülasyon tedavisinin [radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT)] etkinliğini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif kesitsel çalışmaya 2015-2020 yılları arasında kliniğimizde kronik koksidini nedeniyle RFT uygulanan hastalar dâhil edildi. Tüm hastaların en az 6 aydır şikâyetleri vardı. Hastaların tedavi öncesi özellikleri kayıtlardan elde edildi ve tedavi sonrası veriler telefonla toplandı (1, 6, 12 ve 24. aylarda). Tedavi öncesi ağrı şiddeti yüz yüze ve görsel analog skala kullanılarak değerlendirilirken, tedavi sonrası ağrı şiddeti telefon üzerinden hastalardan ağrı şiddetlerini 10 üzerinden puanlamaları istenerek değerlendirildi (0 ağrı yok, 10 en şiddetli ağrı). Bulgular: Çalışmamıza 41 (24 kadın ve 17 erkek) hasta dâhil edildi. Ortanca yaş 43 (37-49 arası) idi. Ortanca ağrı skoru RFT’den 6 ay sonra 9’dan 3’e düştü. Yirmi üç (%56,1) hastanın 24. ay ağrı skorlarında %50 veya daha fazla düşüş gözlendi. Yirmi beş (%61,0) hasta RFT’den memnundu. Ağrı skorlarındaki azalma ile yaş, cinsiyet, beden kitle indeksi ve hastalık süresi arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmadı. İşlem sırasında ve sonrasında herhangi bir komplikasyon gelişmedi. Sonuç: RFT, konservatif tedavi yöntemlerine yanıt vermeyen kronik koksidinili hastalarda güvenilir ve oldukça tatmin edici bir tedavi yöntemidir.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Ganglion impar blockade is used for many chronic pain syndromes originating from the pelvic structures. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) treatment in patients diagnosed with chronic coccydynia who did not respond to conservative therapy. Material and Methods: Patients who underwent RFT for chronic coccydynia between 2015 and 2020 were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. All patients had had complaints for at least 6 months. Patients’ pre-treatment characteristics were obtained from records and post-treatment data was collected by phone (at the 1st, 6th, 12th and 24th months). While pre-treatment pain intensity was evaluated face-to-face and using visual analogue scale, post-treatment pain level was evaluated over the phone by asking patients to score their pain intensity over 10 (0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain). Results: Forty-one patients (24 females and 17 males) were included into the study. Median age was 43 (range 37-49) years. Median pain score decreased from 9 to 3 6 months after RFT. Twenty-three (56.1%) patients had 50% or more decrease in their pain scores at 24 months. Twenty-five (61.0%) patients were satisfied with RFT. No significant relationship was found between the decrease in pain scores and factors such as age, sex, body mass index, and duration of disease. There were no complications during or after the procedure. Conclusion: RFT is a reliable and highly satisfactory treatment method in patients with chronic coccydynia who do not respond to conservative treatment methods.
REFERENCES
  1. Garg B, Ahuja K. Coccydynia-A comprehensive review on etiology, radiological features and management options. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;12:123-9. Erratum in: J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;21:101561. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  2. Howard PD, Dolan AN, Falco AN, et al. A comparison of conservative interventions and their effectiveness for coccydynia: a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther. 2013;21:213-9. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  3. White WD, Avery M, Jonely H, et al. The interdisciplinary management of coccydynia: A narrative review. PM R. 2022;14:1143-54. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  4. Elkhashab Y, Ng A. A review of current treatment options for coccygodynia. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018;22:28. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  5. Lirette LS, Chaiban G, Tolba R, et al. Coccydynia: an overview of the anatomy, etiology, and treatment of coccyx pain. Ochsner J. 2014;14:84-7. [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  6. Foye PM. Coccydynia: tailbone pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2017;28:539-49. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  7. Hochgatterer R, Gahleitner M, Allerstorfer J, et al. Coccygectomy for coccygodynia: a cohort study with a long-term follow-up of up to 29 years. Eur Spine J. 2021;30:1072-6. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  8. Awwad WM, Saadeddin M, Alsager JN, et al. Coccygodynia review: coccygectomy case series. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017;27:961-5. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  9. Choudhary R, Kunal K, Kumar D, et al. Improvement in pain following ganglion impar blocks and radiofrequency ablation in coccygodynia patients: a systematic review. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021;56:558-66. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  10. Sencan S, Edipoglu IS, Ulku Demir FG, et al. Are steroids required in the treatment of ganglion impar blockade in chronic coccydynia? a prospective double-blinded clinical trial. Korean J Pain. 2019;32:301-6. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  11. Dolan RD, Bazarbashi AN, Nelson E, et al. Lower EUS-guided ganglion impar blockade. VideoGIE. 2021;6:427-30. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  12. Woon JT, Stringer MD. Clinical anatomy of the coccyx: A systematic review. Clin Anat. 2012;25:158-67. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  13. Sir E, Eksert S. Comparison of block and pulsed radiofrequency of the ganglion impar in coccygodynia. Turk J Med Sci. 2019;49:1555-9. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  14. Lee CH, Chung CK, Kim CH. The efficacy of conventional radiofrequency denervation in patients with chronic low back pain originating from the facet joints: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spine J. 2017;17:1770-80. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  15. Maas ET, Ostelo RW, Niemisto L, et al. Radiofrequency denervation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015: CD008572. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  16. Liu JF, Shen W, Huang D, et al. Expert consensus of Chinese Association for the Study of Pain on the radiofrequency therapy technology in the Department of Pain. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9:2123-35. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  17. Reig E, Abejón D, del Pozo C, et al. Thermocoagulation of the ganglion impar or ganglion of Walther: description of a modified approach. Preliminary results in chronic, nononcological pain. Pain Pract. 2005;5:103-10. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  18. Kırcelli A, Demirçay E, Özel Ö, et al. Radiofrequency thermocoagulation of the ganglion impar for coccydynia management: long-term effects. Pain Pract. 2019;19:9-15. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  19. Adas C, Ozdemir U, Toman H, et al. Transsacrococcygeal approach to ganglion impar: radiofrequency application for the treatment of chronic intractable coccydynia. J Pain Res. 2016;9:1173-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  20. Malhotra N, Goyal S, Kumar A, et al. Comparative evaluation of transsacrococcygeal and transcoccygeal approach of ganglion impar block for management of coccygodynia. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021;37:90-6. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  21. Van Roo JD, Lazio MP, Pesce C, et al. Visual analog scale (VAS) for assessment of acute mountain sickness (AMS) on Aconcagua. Wilderness Environ Med. 2011;22:7-14. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  22. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, et al. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  23. Usmani H, Dureja GP, Andleeb R, et al. Conventional radiofrequency thermocoagulation vs pulsed radiofrequency neuromodulation of ganglion impar in chronic perineal pain of nononcological origin. Pain Med. 2018;19:2348-56. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  24. Plancarte R. Presacral blockade of the ganglion of Walther (ganglion impar). Anesthesiology. 1990;73:751. [Crossref] 
  25. Atim A, Ergin A, Bilgiç S, et al. Pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of coccygodynia. Agri. 2011;23:1-6. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  26. Nalini KB, Shivanna S, Vishnu MS, et al. Transcoccygeal neurolytic ganglion impar block for perineal pain: A case series. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018;34:544-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  27. Wu H, Zhou J, Chen J, et al. Therapeutic efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Res. 2019;12:423-41. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC]