ISSN: 1309 - 3843 E-ISSN: 1307 - 7384
FİZİKSEL TIP VE REHABİLİTASYON
BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ
www.jpmrs.com
Kayıtlı İndexler


ORIJINAL ARAŞTIRMA

Geleneksel Rehabilitasyona Ek Olarak Repetetif Transkraniyal Manyetik Stimülasyon ile Tedavi Edilen Kronik İnmeli Hastalarda Tedavi Öncesi Üst Ekstremite Motor Bozukluk Düzeyi ile Motor Kazanım Arasındaki İlişki
Relationship Between Baseline Upper Limb Motor Impairment Level and Motor Gain in Chronic Stroke Patients Treated with Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as an Adjunct to Conventional Rehabilitation
Received Date : 24 Jun 2024
Accepted Date : 31 Oct 2024
Available Online : 07 Nov 2024
Doi: 10.31609/jpmrs.2024-104521 - Makale Dili: EN
Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences. 2025;28(1):48-53
ÖZET
Amaç: Düşük frekanslı repetetif transkraniyal manyetik stimülasyon [low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS)] ve geleneksel rehabilitasyon ile birlikte tedavi edilen kronik inmeli hastalarda tedavi öncesi üst ekstremite motor bozukluk düzeyi ile motor kazanım arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışmada, 48 kronik inme hastası başlangıçtaki Fugl-Meyer Üst Ekstremite Motor Bozukluk Ölçeği [Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Impairment Scale (FM-UL)] skorlarına göre ağır (n=16), ağır-orta (n=15) ve orta-hafif (n=17) olmak üzere 3 alt gruba ayrıldı. Ardından, gruplar motor kazanım (FM-UL’deki değişim) açısından karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Konvansiyonel rehabilitasyondan hemen önce 10 seans LF-rTMS tedavisi (istirahat motor eşiğinin %90’ında toplam 12.000 atım) uygulanması, üst ekstremite motor bozukluğunun ağırdan orta-hafife kadar tüm seviyelerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı motor kazanımla sonuçlandı [medyan motor kazanım (çeyrekler arası aralık) ağırdan orta-hafif motor bozukluk düzeyine doğru sırasıyla 0,0 (0,0 ila 1,0), p=0,014; 2,0 (1,0 ila 3,75), p=0,002 ve 2,0 (0,0 ila 4,50), p=0,006]. Gruplar arasında motor kazanım açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark vardı (p=0,027). Şiddetli-orta ve orta-hafif gruplardaki medyan motor kazanımlar şiddetli gruptakilerden istatistiksel anlamlı olarak daha fazlaydı (düzeltilmiş p değerleri <0,05). Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonuçları, geleneksel rehabilitasyonun ardından uygulanan LF-rTMS’nin, üst ekstremite motor bozukluk düzeyinden bağımsız olarak kronik inme hastalarında üst ekstremite motor iyileşmesine katkıda bulunabileceğini göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte, LF-rTMS’nin tek başına klinik olarak anlamlı bir etkiye sahip olup olmadığı, inme hastalarını başlangıçtaki üst ekstremite motor bozukluk düzeylerine göre sınıflandıran sağlam randomize kontrollü çalışmalarla araştırılmalıdır.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the relationship between baseline upper limb motor impairment level and motor gain in chronic stroke patients treated with low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) and conventional rehabilitation. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, 48 chronic stroke patients were divided into 3 subgroups according to the baseline Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Impairment Scale (FM-UL) scores: severe (n=16), severe-to-moderate (n=15), and moderate-to-mild (n=17). The groups were compared for motor gain (change in the FM-UL). Results: The administration of 10 sessions of LF-rTMS treatment (a total of 12,000 pulses at 90% of resting motor threshold) immediately prior to conventional rehabilitation resulted in statistically significant motor gains at all levels of upper limb motor impairment, from severe to moderate-to-mild [median motor gains (interquartile range) were 0.0 (0.0 to 1.0), p=0.014; 2.0 (1.0 to 3.75), p=0.002; and 2.0 (0.0 to 4.50), p=0.006, respectively]. There was also a statistically significant difference in motor gain between the groups (p=0.027). Median motor gains in the severeto- moderate and moderate-to-mild groups were significantly larger than those in the severe group (adjusted p-values were <0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that LF-rTMS followed by conventional rehabilitation may contribute to upper limb motor recovery in chronic stroke patients, regardless of the level of upper limb motor impairment. However, whether the LF-rTMS has a clinically meaningful effect in isolation should be investigated in robust randomised controlled trials stratifying subjects according to their baseline level of upper limb motor impairment.
REFERENCES
  1. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, et al. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:2181-6. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  2. Tofts PS. The distribution of induced currents in magnetic stimulation of the nervous system. Phys Med Biol. 1990;35:1119-28. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  3. Fitzgerald PB, Fountain S, Daskalakis ZJ. A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:2584-96. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  4. Duque J, Murase N, Celnik P, et al. Intermanual Differences in movement-related interhemispheric inhibition. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007;19:204-13. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  5. Li R, Liu S, Li T, et al. The stratified effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in upper limb motor impairment recovery after stroke: a meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1369836. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  6. Takeuchi N, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:2681-6. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  7. Kakuda W, Abo M, Shimizu M, et al; NEURO Investigators. A multi-center study on low-frequency rTMS combined with intensive occupational therapy for upper limb hemiparesis in post-stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9:4. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  8. Yamada N, Kakuda W, Senoo A, et al. Functional cortical reorganization after low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation plus intensive occupational therapy for upper limb hemiparesis: evaluation by functional magnetic resonance imaging in poststroke patients. Int J Stroke. 2013;8:422-9. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  9. Tatsuno H, Hamaguchi T, Sasanuma J, et al. Does a combination treatment of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and occupational therapy improve upper limb muscle paralysis equally in patients with chronic stroke caused by cerebral hemorrhage and infarction?: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100:e26339. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  10. Graef P, Dadalt MLR, Rodrigués DAMDS, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with upper-limb training for improving function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2016;369:149-58. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  11. Hao Z, Wang D, Zeng Y, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013:CD008862. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  12. Harvey RL, Edwards D, Dunning K, et al; NICHE Trial Investigators *. Randomized sham-controlled trial of navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor recovery in stroke. Stroke. 2018;49:2138-46. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  13. Barros Galvão SC, Borba Costa dos Santos R, Borba dos Santos P, et al. Efficacy of coupling repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and physical therapy to reduce upper-limb spasticity in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:222-9. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  14. Rose DK, Patten C, McGuirk TE, et al. Does inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation augment functional task practice to improve arm recovery in chronic stroke? Stroke Res Treat. 2014;2014:305236. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  15. Demirtas-Tatlidede A, Alonso-Alonso M, Shetty RP, et al. Long-term effects of contralesional rTMS in severe stroke: safety, cortical excitability, and relationship with transcallosal motor fibers. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;36:51-9. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  16. Di Lazzaro V, Capone F, Di Pino G, et al. Combining robotic training and non-invasive brain stimulation in severe upper limb-impaired chronic stroke patients. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:88. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  17. Aşkın A, Tosun A, Demirdal ÜS. Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper extremity motor recovery and functional outcomes in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Somatosens Mot Res. 2017;34:102-7. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  18. Hirakawa Y, Takeda K, Tanabe S, et al. Effect of intensive motor training with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper limb motor function in chronic post-stroke patients with severe upper limb motor impairment. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25:321-5. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  19. Woytowicz EJ, Rietschel JC, Goodman RN, et al. Determining levels of upper extremity movement impairment by applying a cluster analysis to the fugl-meyer assessment of the upper extremity in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:456-62. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  20. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13-31. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  21. Page SJ, Fulk GD, Boyne P. Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys Ther. 2012;92:791-8. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  22. Yukawa Y, Shibata S, Koganemaru S, et al. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can alleviate spasticity and induce functional recovery in patients with severe chronic stroke: a prospective, non-controlled, pilot study. Heliyon. 2023;9:e15564. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  23. Hamaguhi T, Abo M. Recovery of patients with upper limb paralysis due to stroke who underwent intervention using low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with occupational therapy: a retrospective cohort study. Neuromodulation. 2023;26:861-77. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  24. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16:232-40. [Crossref]  [PubMed] 
  25. Hiragami S, Inoue Y, Harada K. Minimal clinically important difference for the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity in convalescent stroke patients with moderate to severe hemiparesis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019;31:917-21. [Crossref]  [PubMed]  [PMC] 
  26. Xiang H, Sun J, Tang X, et al. The effect and optimal parameters of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33:847-64. [Crossref]  [PubMed]